Thin skull and crumbling skull cases deal with plaintiffs that have pre-existing medical conditions.
The thin skull rule makes the defendant liable for the plaintiff's injuries even if the injuries are unexpectedly severe owing to a pre-exisiting yet stable condition. The defendant must take the victim as they find them with whatever peculiar weaknesses and predispositions they might have, and is liable even though the plaintiff's losses are more dramatic than they would be for the average person.
The crumbling skull rule deals with a plaintiff that has an unstable pre-existing condition. The defendant need not compensate the plaintiff for the effects of their condition, which they would have experienced anyway. The defendant is liable for additional damage, but not the pre-existing damage.
- Athey v. Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458, 140 D.L.R. (4th) 235, [1997] 1 W.W.R. 97
- Dulieu v. White & Sons, [1901] 2 K.B. 669
- Owens v. Liverpool Corp., [1939] 1 K.B. 394 (available in Vancouver and regional courthouse libraries)
- Canadian Tort Law, 8th edition (available in most BC Courthouse Libraries
- "Causation in Tort in Law: Back to Basics at the Supreme Court of Canada" Alberta Law Review (1997) 35: 1013-34 (available in online in BC Courthouse Libraries and in print in the Vancouver library
- "The Test for Causation for Statutory Accident Benefits: Monk v. ING" The Advocates Quarterly, (2008) 34: 360-375 (available online in BC Courthouse Libraries and in print in the Vancouver Courthouse Library)